![]() ![]() I have just modified 6 external links on Arctic Monkeys discography. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. Ma y ast ( talk) 20:13, 17 November 2013 (UTC) Five minutes But I wouldn't mind if the bubbling-under footnotes (in their current form) stayed as well. If the US has to be there because of its market size, can't we just focus on the US Alternative Chart, where they've had the most relevant success? DackAttac (talk) 19:26, 17 November 2013 (UTC) I think that's a good idea. Mayast (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2013 (UTC) I'm not sure how I feel about the US being there when we've also cleansed it of the Bubbling-Under extrapolations (which is fine by me I always felt they were incredibly misleading). Mayast (talk) 13:03, 11 August 2013 (UTC) Ok, somebody already did the trimming. I think the latter three should probably stay, but CAN and AUS could also be cut. Out of the remaining 14, it seems that the charts with the lowest positions are CAN, AUS, US, GER and JPN. If there will be no objections to this in the next few days, I will delete these five, trimming down the number of charts to 14. Mayast (talk) 12:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC) Here's what the table would look like without MEX, FIN, SWE, ITA and ESP: User:Mayast/sandbox/AMdiscog. I'd like to hear your opinions about which ones should be kept, and which not. ![]() ![]() On the other hand, albums charted relatively low in Canada, for instance. In terms of the music market size, JPN, GER, FRA, CAN, NLD are the biggest of those, while BEL, NOR, AUT, NZ, DK are smaller. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |